If a chakira without chalut is a chakira, then the condition is not upheld, and the woman is not mekudeshet. Easy enough.
If a chakira without chalut is NOT a chakira, that implies that there is no such thing as a "Platonic" idea existing without physical ramifications. Thus it makes no sense to make a tnai on based the characteristics of chakirot, since chakirot themselves are non-physical, Platonic ideas. The tnai is meaningless and cannot be upheld, so the woman is still not mekudeshet!
3 comments:
the nafka mina is, of course, someone who is mekadesh a woman al tnai that a chakira without a nafka mina is not a chakira at all.
Let's examine that one.
If a chakira without chalut is a chakira, then the condition is not upheld, and the woman is not mekudeshet. Easy enough.
If a chakira without chalut is NOT a chakira, that implies that there is no such thing as a "Platonic" idea existing without physical ramifications. Thus it makes no sense to make a tnai on based the characteristics of chakirot, since chakirot themselves are non-physical, Platonic ideas. The tnai is meaningless and cannot be upheld, so the woman is still not mekudeshet!
:)
Post a Comment